The Keepit Dam Safety Upgrade Project is being implemented to bring the 54m high concrete gravity dam in line with current guidelines for flood and earthquake loading. Stage 2A of the project involves the installation of two vertical 91 strand post-tensioned anchors on each monolith of the spillway section.
During coring of the anchor head blocks for the vertical anchors, deep cracks were observed across some monoliths, dipping diagonally in an upstream direction. In two of the monoliths the cracks were found to be continuous enough to possibly daylight at the upstream face and form freestanding blocks. If the freestanding blocks postulate is correct, the block stability could be currently relying on the friction of the cracked surface and on the engagement with shear keys of adjacent monoliths, which are provided in the vertical contraction joints.
This paper will explain the complex 3-D nonlinear Finite Element Analysis (FEA) conducted to replicate the conditions of the cracked spillway monoliths during the post-tensioned anchor installation. The nonlinearity captured the expected opening, closing and sliding of the crack, as well as its potential pressurisation, and the residual shear strength retention due to asperities of the crack surface. For the shear keys of the vertical contraction joints, the nonlinearity captured the force-deformation relationship of the plain concrete, up to a brittle failure condition if the shear strength threshold was reached.
The 3-D nonlinear FEA was also used to design the optimum number of Macalloy post-tensioned bars required to stitch the freestanding block to the monolith, so that the vertical anchors can be safely installed. In addition, the remedial design accounted for future extreme design flood and extreme earthquake loading conditions, the latter modelled with a time-history analysis.
The ANCOLD Guidelines (2019) require that active and neotectonic faults which could significantly
contribute to the ground-shaking or ground-displacement hazard for a dam should be accounted for in seismic hazard assessments. While geological and geomorphological field investigations along suspected active fault structures are undertaken as a matter of course in New Zealand, this practice is relatively uncommon in Australia. Granted, rates of tectonic processes are greater in New Zealand than in intraplate Australia. However, moderate to large and damaging earthquakes are not uncommon in the Australian record; there have been ~26 earthquakes of magnitude >M6 in the last 150 years (~1 event every ~6 years) and similar events might be expected in the future. We present examples of investigations undertaken to better understand earthquake hazard for two faults – previous studies on the Wellington Fault, New Zealand, and new data from recent investigations of the Avonmore Scarp, southeast Australia. We report the results from these studies and discuss how the collection of similar data on faults proximal to Australian dams would allow dam owners and operators to better quantify seismic hazard and, thereby, more meaningfully comply with the ANCOLD guidelines.
Otago Regional Council (ORC) own and operate the Lower Taieri, Lower Clutha, and Alexandra Flood Protection Schemes. Collectively the schemes comprise over 220 km of earthfill levees, together with numerous appurtenant structures, such as major spillways, flood gates and pumping stations. The schemes provide flood protection to significant and varied communities and infrastructure adjacent to the Clutha and Taieri rivers, for example Dunedin Airport, and towns such as Balclutha and Outram. The works were constructed at various times since the 19th century to a range of standards, and assets are at various lifecycle stages.
Regular and systematic condition and structural integrity assessment is a key aspect of operating flood protection schemes for resilient communities. This can be challenging due to the large spatial extent of multiple schemes. Efficient and effective on-the-ground visual inspection of the entire network is key. A field assessment methodology was developed which combined on-the-ground visual assessment with innovative use of GIS technology, for field data capture, recording, analysis and presentation.
The structural assessment methodology used LiDAR-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) integrated with the field data to screen the levee networks based on geometry condition, to identify critical locations for analysis. Levee susceptibility to hazards such as overtopping scour, piping, seismic performance and slope instability was assessed utilising a semi-quantitative multi criteria analysis. Subsequent efforts were focused on critical locations enabling analysis which would not be efficient on a scheme-wide scale. An outcome included a GIS database to enable rapid future review of asset information and condition.
The assessment coincided with the July 2017 Taieri River flood – the largest event in almost forty years, and a timely reminder of the importance of flood protection infrastructure for community resilience. This event also highlighted the importance of making use of such events to field-truth assessment results and test assumptions about scheme performance and vulnerable locations.
The Waimea Community Dam will be the largest multipurpose concrete face rockfill dam (CFRD) to be constructed in New Zealand. This 53 m high CFRD will impound a reservoir of 13 Mm3 and is essential to securing the future water needs of the community and environment of the Waimea Plains and wider Tasman/Nelson region.
The design of this unique large dam in the New Zealand context was a long-term collaboration of local dam design expertise and international experience that took the ‘historic precedent based design approach’ for CFRD’s and supplemented this with modern embankment design techniques for the highly seismic environment at the dam site. Design of this High Potential Impact Category dam presented a range of technical challenges for the designers and wider project team, which required new and innovative design solutions and approaches.
The dam features a number of unique arrangements in the New Zealand context including:
The project had its origins in the early 2000’s. Detailed design commenced in 2010, and was externally peer reviewed. The detailed design stage was undertaken in an Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) process which was completed in February 2019.
This paper covers the important seismic design aspects for this large dam, including understanding and designing for the potential range of displacements and embankment deformations to inform the crest parapet wall and diversion culvert designs, and understand how differing rockfill properties might affect the dam performance. Quantifying the range of potential dam performance enabled a more resilient dam design.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has a robust Dam Safety Program (DSP) that utilizes risk- informed decision-making to prioritize its portfolio of dams in need of further study and modifications. USACE also utilizes a two-tiered governance structure in which one body makes portfolio recommendations around risk management while the other body oversees the execution of the agency’s routine DSP and makes policy recommendations. The routine program consists of the activities required for interim risk reduction measures, inspections, instrumentation, monitoring, assessments, operations and maintenance, emergency action planning, training, and other dam safety activities. An internal program management tool exists to monitor and track all these activities and generate metrics around execution of the routine DSP, however, it does not include metrics around other aspects of the DSP like governance, asset management, public safety and security, flow controls, or audits/reviews. USACE hopes to identify gaps in its DSP that can be used to correct shortcomings, continuously improve, and to increase the resilience of its DSP, which will enable each project to deliver benefits to the Nation. The Centre for Energy Advancement through Technological Innovation (CEATI), through its Dam Safety Interest Group (DSIG), collaboratively developed a spreadsheet tool known as the Dam Safety Maturity Matrix (DSMM). The DSMM is a facilitated exercise used to help evaluate how well-developed a program is across 12 elements considered to be typical and important of most dam safety programs. Each of the elements is then deaggregated into sub-elements, each of which can be evaluated by the team. The maturity ranges across 5 levels from Needing Improvement to Leading Edge. After all sub-elements are evaluated, an aggregate maturity level is computed that gives an estimation of the overall maturity level of the program. USACE will present the results of its pilot project using the DSMM and share lessons learned regarding its implementation. The short-term goal is to identify program strengths and areas for improvement, while the long-term goal of USACE using the DSMM is to participate in bench- marking across multiple agencies and international dam owners regarding their dam safety programs, for which has never been done to the knowledge of this author.
Leslie Harrison Dam is located on Tingalpa Creek in the Redlands region, approximately 18 km southeast of Brisbane. It is classified as an extreme hazard category dam with a large population at risk only a short distance downstream.
The dam comprises a 25 m high zoned earthfill embankment, with a dry well concrete intake tower and an outlet conduit located at the base of the dam near the old river channel. The spillway has a 43 m wide concrete gravity ogee crest, with a concrete lined chute terminating in an energy dissipator structure.
Seqwater is undertaking a staged upgrade of Leslie Harrison Dam to address deficiencies identified during the Portfolio Risk Assessment (URS 2013) and Geotechnical Investigations (GHD 2016).
While the dam has met the water supply needs of the community for the past 50 years, the upgrade ensures local residents will be well served into the future. Additionally, the structure will meet the most up to date requirements of dam safety management and national industry standards.
Construction of the Stage 1 upgrade commenced in June 2018 and involved the removal and replacement of liquefiable material in the foundation, modernisation and extension of the outlet works, addition of a new downstream filter buttress to the embankment, and lastly, the installation of both active and passive anchors within the spillway ogee and lower chute floor.
As with any major project, the works involved a number of challenges that had to be addressed. This paper provides an insight into the key challenges encountered and how these were overcome by the design and construction teams using practical engineered solutions. The intent is to provide the reader with an account of the “lessons learned” during the construction phase, along with recommendations for future dam upgrades.